tsandefur

/Timothy Sandefur
Timothy Sandefur

About Timothy Sandefur

Timothy Sandefur is a Principal Attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation, where he is the lead attorney in the Foundation’s Economic Liberty Project, devoted to promoting constitutional protection for the freedom of business owners and entrepreneurs. He also litigates against the abuse of eminent domain, having defended property owners in courts across the country, and blogs regularly on the Foundation's PLF Liberty Blog. He is the author of two books, Cornerstone of Liberty: Property Rights in 21st Century America (Cato Institute, 2006) and The Right to Earn A Living: Economic Freedom And The Law (Cato Institute, 2010), as well as some 40 scholarly articles on subjects ranging from eminent domain and economic liberty to copyright, evolution and creationism, and the legal issues of slavery and the Civil War. His articles have appeared in National Review, Liberty, The Claremont Review of Books, Forbes Online, The San Francisco Chronicle, The Washington Times, and other places. He is an adjunct professor of law at the McGeorge School of Law in Sacramento, and an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute. Sandefur is a graduate of Chapman University School of Law and Hillsdale College.
24 May, 2011

New briefs challenging the Individual Mandate

2019-03-18T18:48:01-05:00May 24th, 2011|

Yesterday, I and representatives from several pro-freedom organizations filed this amicus brief in Seven-Sky v. Holder, the latest Court of Appeals case about the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. I also filed briefs in the Fourth Circuit case and the Eleventh Circuit case. The briefs cover different—and very interesting—issues. As I [...]

20 Apr, 2011

The Constitution And The Civil War

2019-03-18T18:48:03-05:00April 20th, 2011|

I’ve written at great length about the constitutional issues involved in the Civil War, mostly in response to the increasingly popular argument that secession actually was constitutional and that the Lincoln Administration had no legal authority to use force against the Confederacy—but also in response to various other criticisms of Lincoln and the Union cause. [...]

4 Apr, 2011

Fighting the Individual Mandate in the Fourth Circuit

2019-03-18T18:48:04-05:00April 4th, 2011|

A few months ago, federal judge Henry Hudson ruled that the Obama Administration’s health care law—and specifically, the requirement that everyone buy health insurance from a private company—exceeds Congress’ constitutional authority. That case (which you can read here) is now on appeal before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, and today, PLF, [...]

20 Mar, 2011

Legitimate rule and substantive due process

2019-03-18T18:48:04-05:00March 20th, 2011|

David Kopel put up a very nice post about the many philosophers who have written on the distinction between a true government and a gang of armed robbers. According to these philosophers, there are real differences between a gang and a government—that is, the latter operates according to certain fundamental principles of [...]

18 Mar, 2011

Misquoting Federalist 78

2011-03-18T23:25:50-05:00March 18th, 2011|

 One of my long-standing pet peeves is the way advocates of “judicial restraint” often mis-quote Alexander Hamilton’s brilliant Federalist 78. They’re particularly fond of the phrase “if they [the courts] should be disposed to exercise WILL instead of JUDGMENT, the consequence would equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of [...]

11 Mar, 2011

Alternatives to originalism the American constitutional order

2019-03-18T18:48:05-05:00March 11th, 2011|

I was just reminded of this panel discussion on “conservative and libertarian alternatives to originalism” that I attended back in January. I found it ironic because there was only one libertarian on the panel, and nobody offered any alternatives to originalism. And yes, that’s me talking at 1:04:30. […]